Munich School of Ancient Philosophy
print

Search
Hinweise zur Datenübertragung bei der Google™ Suche
Links and Functions
  • www.en.lmu.de
  • Faculty of Languages and Literatures
  • LMU-Portal
  • Sitemap

Breadcrumb Navigation
  • Home
  • Events
  • Past Events
  • ​

Main Navigation
  • Events
    • Intellect and Contemplation
    • Ganph Kolloquium
    • LMU-HU Graduate Student Conference
    • Talk by Gabor Betegh (Cambridge)
    • Past Events
      • 7th Berlin-Munich Graduate Workshop in Ancient Philosophy
      • Dorothea Frede on the Timaeus
      • Workshop: Prior Analytics
      • Cambridge/LMU Meeting
      • De Motu Revisited
      • Paradigms. Thinking and Explaining in Terms of Models.
      • Received Opinions: Doxography in Antiquity and the Islamic World
      • Conference: 29th-30th June 2017 Aristotle's Topics and Analytics: convergences and divergences
      • LMU-HU Graduate Workshop in Ancient Philosophy April 28th-29th 2017
      • LMU-Cambridge Workshop in Ancient Philosophy April 20th- 21st 2017
      • MUSAΦ Symposium on Aristotle’s Eudemian Ethics
  • People
  • Current Seminars
  • Doctoral Program
  • Master's Program
  • Contact

  • print

Content

​Fred D. Miller (Bowling Green) "Aristotle's First Cause" ​ 6 pm-8 pm, Monday, November​ 17th, 2014 Munich School of Ancient Philosophy (MUSAΦ) Leopoldstr. 11b, 4th Floor, Room 433

17.11.2014 18:00  – 20:00 


Fred D. Miller
(Bowling Green)

"Aristotle's First Cause"

6 pm-8 pm, Monday, November 17th, 2014
Munich School of Ancient Philosophy (MUSAΦ)
Leopoldstr. 11b, 4th Floor, Room 433

Abstract:
In Metaphysics Book XII (Lambda) Aristotle argues that the cosmos has a first cause, which is a divine, eternal, intelligent, incorporeal, immutable substance. In what sense of ‘cause’ is it a cause? There is evidence that Aristotle thinks it is an efficient as well as final cause. But surely these two modes of causation do not merely happen to coincide. So, is one of them more fundamental? that is, is the prime mover an efficient cause because it is final or a final cause because it is efficient? The dominant interpretation is that the unmoved mover is primarily (e.g. W. D. Ross et al.) or even exclusively (e.g. C. Kahn) a final cause. This reading is challenged by a minority (e.g. S. Broadie, E. Berti) who contend that the prime mover must be viewed as primarily an efficient cause. Though both camps find some textual support, each faces theoretical difficulties. A tempting solution is that the unmoved mover is like a world-soul which operates as both an efficient and final cause, and that these are necessarily interconnected modes of causation (e.g. A. Kosman, M. Matthen). But this is a view which Aristotle evidently rejects. Although commentators disagree over the correct interpretation, they should consider whether the interpretative controversy may point to deeper difficulties in Aristotle’s “first philosophy.”


  • print
  • top

Footer
  • Imprint and Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Accessibility